gondola news
As the Wasatch Front Regional Council reopened its Regional Transportation Plan review, FoLCC has submitted a new public comment challenging the Little Cottonwood Canyon gondola on every front: a reliability claim contradicted by UDOT's own EIS, a loading station built on a toxic EPA Superfund site, and a legal opinion written by a firm with an undisclosed tie to Snowbird. Our ask is simple — don't lock in a billion-dollar, resort-benefiting gondola without proof it's actually needed.
“Improved bus service and infrastructure over the next two years”: Our View on UDOT’s Recent Announcement
Many are elated over UDOT’s recent about-face decision to begin Phase 1 congestion improvements in Little Cottonwood Canyon (LCC) after claiming, for nearly two years, that lawsuits prohibited this very action. We understand the excitement. And while we appreciate UDOT’s long history of providing Utah residents an expansive transportation system, our concerns are not primarily about what UDOT announced—it’s about what UDOT’s announcement omits.
Gondola B is UDOT's selected long-term alternative, with buses and sheds as stepping stones, NOT as a test that can cancel the gondola. You’ve probably heard some version of this promise from UDOT, politicians and other stakeholders regarding the proposed Gondola B solution for Little Cottonwood Canyon: “We’ll start with more frequent buses and avalanche sheds. We’ll only build the gondola if those don’t work.” But that’s not what UDOT actually decided.
